Analyzing the Regulatory Arbitrage Potency of the Indian Corporate Restructuring Regime, in the Specific Context of Reverse Mergers from the Lens of Investor Protection

Publication Information

Journal Title: Asian Law & Public Policy Review
Author(s): Abhishek Akshantala
Published On: 11/01/2024
Volume: 8
First Page: 228
Last Page: 237
ISSN: 2581-6551
Publisher: The Law Brigade Publisher

DOI: 10.55662/ALPPR.2023.808

Cite this Article

Abhishek Akshantala, Analyzing the Regulatory Arbitrage Potency of the Indian Corporate Restructuring Regime, in the Specific Context of Reverse Mergers from the Lens of Investor Protection, Volume 8, Asian Law & Public Policy Review, 228-237, Published on 11/01/2024, 10.55662/ALPPR.2023.808 Available at https://alppr.thelawbrigade.com/article/the-inherent-futility-of-exceptional-debt-recovery-mechanisms-alternative-to-the-sarfaesi-2002-such-as-the-ots-scheme-due-to-creditor-rights-primacy/

Abstract

The concept of corporate restructuring may be primarily defined as the systemic alteration of corporate composition; entailing the “re-organization” of business activity [classified as principal revenue generation/operation; Investment (Portfolio-Holding) and Financing][i] in furtherance of the optimal fulfilment of organizational objectives (subject to the mitigation of extraneous and intrinsic cost- inclusive of ‘Agency Costs’). Corporate restructuring, may hence be characterized as a modus operandi of evolutionary business survival- fostering the dynamic mitigation of detrimental costs (often impairing fundamental profitability/metrics of financial health)- attributable to both internal and external business ecosystems. The 3 forms of corporate restructuring- derived from the classification of business activity, entail: financial, organizational and investment portfolio restructuring.[ii] Financial restructuring would amount to the alteration of corporate capital structure or the principal financing activities of a business. Organizational restructuring would amount to the alteration of principal business operations (entailing the combination of productive factors- and their organization i.e., human capital deployment, sales strategy deployed). Investment portfolio restructuring would pertain to the alteration of a company’s investments (potentially subject to any degree of control/stake retained by the company devoid of the materiality of ‘holding characterization’) and/or investment structure (potentially definitive of the composition of its principal business operations). Such classes of corporate restructuring transactions, may be subject to concurrent relevance, with a specific restructuring attempt (i.e., The acquisition of a competing business), potentially amounting to financial, organizational and investment portfolio restructuring.

[i] Taxmann, Corporate Restructuring: Types and Importance, 23rd January, 2023, available at https://www.taxmann.com/post/blog/corporate-restructuring-types-and-importance/.

[ii] Philip A. Gibbs, Determinants of Corporate Restructuring: The Relative Importance of Corporate Governance, Takeover Threat and Free Cash Flow, Strategic Management Journal Vol. 14 (1993), pp. 51-68.

Keywords: Reverse Merger Regulation, Mergers and Acquisitions, Backdoor IPO, Securities Regulation, Initial Public Offering, Indian Corporate Restructuring Law, Investor Protection, Indian Regulatory Arbitrage

Share this research

Latest Publications

Asian Law & Public Policy Review
Scroll to Top